encfs vs ecryptfs

Furthermore, eCryptfs is not designed for cloud storage. Hi all. Additionally, if I've understood it correctly, the metadata is stored in the files themselves instead of EncFS's per-directory configuration file (.encfs6.xml). What kind of security would encryption provide if no key is needed to decrypt it? I used an old Lucid (10.04) install to mount my encrypted folder (was using 12.04 on my PC and it was the only available Linux install around) (C code using the ecryptfs library vs a lot of Bash subshells and shuffling). The problem with eCryptfs seems to be that it requires either root or fstab entries (which in turn require root). I'm not marking this as solved yet because I still think there's a way to do what I want, but I just can't spend any more time on trying to figure out how. Incidentally, I have opened a bug report to get ecryptfs and fuse.encfs added to the default PRUNEFS array in updatedb.conf: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30068. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Things like mlocate. eCryptfs is not available for Windows but there are plenty of alternatives that runs on Windows with similar functionality. rsync of the underlying files). It's basically the successor to encfs and fixes (or avoids) almost all of encfs issues. As for the remote storage, I have a server running ownCloud but everyone agrees their remote encryption is very insecure. When comparing EncFS vs Cryptomator, the Slant community recommends Cryptomator for most people. Why is eCryptfs not secure? Use LUKS/dm-crypt instead and provides the same benefits you are looking for in eCryptfs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPEKX3WE-VI, Last edited by hunterthomson (2013-01-20 06:20:21). When you say "full-disk-encryption", do you mean full system encryption? When FUSE became available, I wrote a CFS replacement f… I got bored and decided to do a fresh Manjaro install on my desktop (Ryzen 2600, 16GB DDR4). Depending on your configuration there may be similar in nature security holes. It also works well together with other cloud providers. I was looking for a way to make a simple arbitrary ecryptfs less rocketsciency and google redirected me to this topic. It has been implemented as a stackable file system and provides filesystem-level encryption. Don't really need help with the technical aspect. In that case, I understand your point. I have not tried it myself, but it is possible thinly provisioned LVM LVs containing LUKS partitions would also be a solution to your problem. You could limit the disk usage of individual users with quotas. Cryptomator is ranked 1st while EncFS is ranked 2nd Then use udisks or udisks2 to mount the unencrypted block-device as a normal user. Last edited by Redsandro (2013-01-18 20:50:01). [ To the main EncFS source changes report] eCryptFS is a kernel module, while EncFS uses FUSE. Cryptsetup in sudoers is one step in the clever direction, but it still queries the kernel keyring, and I still have to add key/sig on reboot? An obvious one would be if your swap partition wasn't encrypted and sensitive information was paged out to it and an attacker had access to your machine at a later time - even when the /home information was not unlocked. Yes you can do this with LUKS/dm-crypt. Will the unencrypted file be … Yes, however with file-based encryption all the data in leaked as soon as you decrypt the file. Just want opinions/experiences on whether I should use eCryptFS or encfs to get the job done. Nevertheless, I like the idea of using eCryptfs as it is supposedly faster and seemingly enjoys more widespread support. What can not be trusted is remote locations and portable storage. zuluCrypt is currently Linux onlyand it does hard drives encryption and it can manage PLAIN dm-crypt volumes, LUKS encrypted volumes, TrueCrypt encrypted volumes, VeraCrypt encrypted volumes and Microsoft’s BitLocker volumes. One of the two you listed (I think encfs) splits your files into many smaller files which really has an impact on I/P performance. Ecryptfs is tied very close to Ubuntu and currently getting phased out by them. The files can therefore be decrypted as long as they exist, whereas EncFS files depend on an extra file that could be lost (unlikely with proper backups, but still possible). I haven't found a convenient way yet to let a user mount an arbitrary directory at an arbitrary location (arbitrary in the sense that the user has the required permissions). The problem with eCryptfs seems to be that it requires either root or fstab entries (which in turn require root). It is not secure. Cryfs splits all files in small chunks and distributes them in the filesystem. But ecryptfs wants your passphrase to be in the kernel keyring. mlocate as a security-hole in non-full-disk-encryption is mentioned in the Wiki: Here. Hi, I just discovered this project and I am considering to use it to replace encfs, but it's write performance is significantly worse than encfs on my laptop. They do leak some data (approximate file size, modification and access times, attributes, etc) though, and there is extra overhead associated with them compared to a block device, even more if they are stacked on top of an encrypted partition. That's handy info. Yes always use a long passphrase and change your passphrase about every month or better. The enterprise cryptographic filesystem for Linux. Maybe there's even a simpler way than PAM. I was thinking of rsyncing inotified ecryptfs changes to the remote as live backup. Using block encryption is not as versatile (fixed size, complicated backups) but I avoid double-encryption overhead and the hassles of using ecryptfs differently from the developers. I thought, if so many distro's use it as a default, there's gotta be something to it.I want to use a long passphrase, that's why I need it in my keychain permanently. I created a 1.2GB file to get an idea of how long it would > take to write/read using ecryptfs vs non-ecryptfs on an ext3 file > system. EncFS is open sourcesoftware, licensed under the LGPL. Well first of all. Like EncFS, it doesn't encrypt file sizes or directory structure and therefore has the same problems as described above. It is not a clever step it is what sudo is for. I was under the assumption that you cannot. The head developer of encfs pretty much abandoned the project. From what I've read so far it seems that it should be possible with PAM, but I haven't dealt with PAM before so I don't know. I did a talk about encrypted filesystems a month ago at the Chemnitzer Linux-Tage and looked deep into the details of encfs, gocrypts, cryfs and ecryptfs. mount) only when necessary. The directory at Dropbox/encrypted in your home folder is where the encrypted versions of your files will be saved – they’re in the Dropbox folder, so Dropbox will sync them. Run the following command to install EncFS on Ubuntu: On other distributions of Linux, look for the EncFS package in your package manager and install it. Disk encryption only provides physical security. My Arch Linux Stuff • Forum Etiquette • Community Ethos - Arch is not for everyone. I basically just want to be able to use eCryptfs the same way I can use EncFS. I don't know about impossible, but I couldn't figure out how to set up arbitrary mount points. Run the following command to create a new EncFS encrypted volume: This creates two directories. When unmounted, you obviously can't get anything from the block device whereas you can still get approximate size, mtime, etc from the underlying directory of the stacked system (but not names, if they're encrypted). From: Dan Prev by Date: Re: wmv locks entire system ever since upgrade to 6.0.1; Next by Date: Re: libxaw7-dev busted, not sure why; Previous by thread: Ecryptfs vs encfs ... My Rec ommendation for ecryptfs. Do you by any chance also know a simple-ish way to automatically mount an arbitrary (not the preconfigured home) passphrased ecryptfs directory when logging in?Common stuff works when logging in because the user keyring is unlocked. Store my project files encrypted remotely on untrusted sources such as dropbox, ubuntu one, google drive. Once you've added the passphrase to the kernel keyring with ecryptfs-add-passphrase --fnek, you can mount/unmount transparently without the passphrase using: sudo mount -it ecryptfs ~/source/ ~/target/ -o ecryptfs_cipher=aes,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16,ecryptfs_enable_filename_crypto=yes,ecryptfs_sig=[sig],ecryptfs_fnek_sig=[sig]. Cosa sia meglio, non saprei... bye, -- … eCryptFS is a kernel module, while EncFS uses FUSE. EncFS provides an encrypted filesystem in user-space. However, for a cross-platform encryption solution you may want to look into TrueCrypt for block encryption and GPG for file encryption. Then create any filesystem you want on it. All. The keychain is safely locked away in my encrypted home, which can be physically trusted anyway. Encryption is the process in which a plain text data, a message or information, is converted to a random and meaningless data, commonly known as ciphertext. Is somehow possibile to migrate it to EncFS without re-encrypting it and thus without re-upload it to Dropbox? The Private folder in your home folder is where the decrypted versions of your files will be ac… zuluCrypt can manage encrypted volumes that are hosted in image files, lvm, mdraid, hard drives, usb sticks or any other block device. EncFS implements bitrot detection on top of any underlying filesystem Scalable storage. @RedsandroMy understanding of how eCryptfs works is overall superficial (which is also why I am not yet disputing hunterthomson's claims) so I do not know how to do what you have described. Last edited by hunterthomson (2013-01-20 07:07:35). The most popular Windows alternative is TrueCrypt, which is both free and Open Source.If that doesn't suit you, our users have ranked 37 alternatives to eCryptfs and many of them are available for Windows so hopefully you can find a suitable replacement. Encrypting directories with ENCFS: I added EncFS as a bonus, EncFS is just another method shown in this tutorial but it isn’t the best as it is warned by the tool itself during the installation process due security concerns, it has a different way to use. Anyway, apart from opinions, I take that you have no answer to my question? If you want this then use GPG. The encrypted files are not accessed very often so the directory is usually not mounted. Encfs development begun in 2003, when cryptographic standards weren't as developed as they currently are. Ecryptfs and dm-crypt have both been part of the mainline kernel since 2.6, and ecryptfs is the default for *Buntu.Having a container on remote storage is a bad idea and not as versatile. CryFS encrypts your Dropbox and protects you against hackers and data leaks. Last edited by hunterthomson (2013-01-19 10:04:52), OpenBSD-current Thinkpad X230, i7-3520M, 16GB CL9 Kingston, Samsung 830 256GBContributor: linux-grsec. You should not use eCryptfs. Thus you cannot gather meta data of the underlying files, like size, a/c/mtime, directory structure etc. The only access barrier then is your account login, in which case you may as well just create a script with the passphrase to add it to the keyring automatically (invoked via your shell profile, for example). encfs - mounts or creates an encrypted virtual filesystem Synopsis. You boot and right after grub you enter your password in the console then it unlocks everything else and finishes booting. CryFS does this, but CryFS wasn't developed with OP's use case in mind. Last edited by Redsandro (2013-01-19 13:56:14). It is not secure.EncFS's security is still questionable. FYI, this script enables mounting ecryptfs folders without root access or touching the fstab: I may have misunderstood how that script works, but I believe that ecryptfs-simple does the same thing more efficiently. Is that what you're referring to? EncFS needs config files in place). I agree that block encryption is the better option for full security, but stacked systems have the advantage of dynamic space allocation and easy backups (e.g. Add Video or Image. eCryptfs is a tool for Linux, mainly known because you're already using it if you're encrypting your home directory in Ubuntu Linux. encfs(1) - Linux man page Name. That would make backup to my NAS go faster, I suppose. Then everything can be automated. It is a pass-through filesystem, not an encrypted block device, which means it is created on top of an existing filesystem. You should not use eCryptfs. EncFS's security is still questionable. Don't take my word for it. Ecryptfs vs encfs. The basic passphrase mode of operation provides equivalent func-tionality to that of EncFS[23] or CFS[20], with the … @Xyne, partially true, but having the key in a file has the extra risk of lacking the protection which a keyring has built-in specifically. STACKEXCHANGE Q&A. You can use lvm over luks for partitioning. I am generally used to encrypting entire block devices with Luks/cryptsetup, which is what I did to my boot drive. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the linuxquestions community, Press J to jump to the feed. From a neutral point of view, you should consider that per-file encryption of eCryptfs may slow down low-performance hardware but allows a great level of flexibility, making the encryption process optional for your users and reversible without formatting if you need to change the MBT layout. 2. Just mount a file on a loopback, encrypt it with LUKS/dm-crypt and put that file on DropBox. What can not be trusted is remote locations and portable storage. I use encfs to backup my data to my external hard drive. Second, dm-crypt is the successor to ecyrptfs; why would you use an old system? But the next day (aka after reboot) you have to add the key to the kernel ring all over again, making this unconvenient. That's wrong, encfs does not split files. Stacked file systems are easier to work with because of dynamic space requirements and the ability to use standard backup tools on the underlying encrypted files. What distro still uses ecryptfs? In the end I gave up fighting with eCryptfs and the hard-coded paths and decided to just go with EncFS for small directories and LUKS for large ones. Development of EncFS seems to be stalled, too. Encfs is also in the process of dying, the security review found several issues which still are not fixed and probably never will be fixed. Related question: can encrypted mountpoints be hidden from mtab? As I understand it, both stacked and block systems are visible when mounted. You could only decrypt the file to like a ramdisk or tempfs to solve that problem. Cryfs is also very modern but with a different approach suited for usage in cloudstorage. You can create a precomputed hash lookup table for cryptoloop. You should not use eCryptfs. eCryptfs fornisce un vero file system di crittografia del disco Linux impilato. Obviously the system files need to be accessible for the system to be usable, but users may have sensitive data that they prefer to make accessible (i.e. The gocryptfs documentation has an overview of some virtual encrypted file systems: https://nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/comparison/. – Dustin Kirkland 19 gen. 12 2012-01-19 02:03:13 Until yesterday everything has always gone fine. The configuration for EncFS is in the form of a dotfile (.encfs6.xml) and it's stored in the working directory. EncFS has no "volumes" that occupy a fixed size — encrypted directories grow and shrink as more files are added to or removed from the mountpoint EncFS is now over 15 years old (first release in 2003). I find it very convenient to have a stacked filesystem that can grow as needed (as opposed to pre-allocated block encryption). Just want input. Cloud-storage optimized If you are deploying stacked filesystem encryption to achieve zero-knowledge synchronization with third-party-controlled locations such as cloud-storage services, you may want to consider alternatives to eCryptfs and EncFS, since these are not optimized for transmission of files over the Internet. Does it basically work the same as eCryptFS? It runs without any special permissions and uses the FUSE library and Linux kernel module to Encrypt your data with EncFS on … Last edited by Xyne (2012-05-28 19:46:41), I ended up writing a utility to do what I want:ecryptfs-simple project pageforum thread. Again, I am not really sure I know what you want. Admittedly, I am using Mint Cinnamon in stead of Arch, but we're all friends here, right? From: "Todd A. Jacobs" Prev by Date: Re: Debian 6.0.1 ia64 DVD release looks strange; Next by Date: aptitude over-zealous on removals? Does eCryptfs work like how Encfs does ? Obviously I have pretty big problems if someone has root or physical access to the machine, but I would prefer not to broadcast the location of encrypted directories and when they are mounted. It was written becauseolder NFS and kernel-based encrypted filesystems such as CFS had not kept pace with Linuxdevelopment. This way you only have to remember the passphrase because all the other metadata is stored in the configuration file. Then, after formatting my internal hard drive, I needed to access data on my encrypted folder. This thread was really only about getting eCryptfs to behave more like EncFS, but I'll give some more background. Although eCryptfs is geared toward securing data in enterprise environments, we explored how eCryptfs can be flexible for use in a wide variety of circumstances. Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSUSE all use LUKS/dm-crypt now. eCryptfs vs EncFS for subdirectories of $HOME. 2. EncFS goes so far as to disclose it when you start up the encfs cli utility to ensure their users (new and old) are informed which is how I found out. EncFS è un software molto semplice e intuitivo per la crittografia del disco Linux. EncFS is pretty much dead, the head developer abandoned the project after almost 15 years of development. It has highest performance and security. If that script is only accessibly by your account and never uploaded to remote storage then it would achieve the same level of security, no? http://stackexchange.com/search?q=ecryptfs As for the rest of of your remarks, disk-based vs file-based encryption have different uses and are not interchangeable. Encrypted data can only accessed by authorized parties while those who are not authorized cannot access it. Gocryptfs uses the same ideas as encfs but with much better cryptographic primitives. eCryptfs (the Enterprise Cryptographic Filesystem) is a POSIX-compliant encrypted filesystem that has been part of the mainline Linux Kernel since version 2.6.19. EncFS's security is still questionable. I don't really understand what you are trying to say here. A attacker may be able to gather the names of the files themselves in a situation like that and even that may not be acceptable to you. However, with LUKS/dm-crypt you can make a file, mount it with -o loop and encrypt it. NOTE: Windows 7 users should use a drive (like "X:") as plain_dir to avoid case sensitive problems which results in file/folder … Anyway, LUKS doesn't provide the benefits I am looking for because it's disk-based.Looking for: File-based enctyption where I can just copy files on usb/smartphone/email and use them on a different location, File-system indendent, so no NTFS/EFS, ZFS or something stored in LUKS, loop or sparse files like TrueCrypt, Files not depending on anything (e.g. Riguardo encfs vs. ectryptfs, un'altra differenza (almeno, quando li provai io), e` che encfs ha la chiave in un unico file, mentre ecryptfs aggiunge un header ad ogni file. I confused ecryptfs with cryptoloop. Anyway, distros use ecryptfs and LUKS/dm-crypt by default because they are in the mainline kernel. Can you resize a Luks partition easily this way? Yes, I guess I mean full system encryption. Wondering about performance and ease of use. Personally, while I like the simplicity of EncFS, I recommend eCryptFS. There is also the issue of meta-data being generated off of your encrypted data into areas of the file-system which are not encrypted. -edit-I guess in theory I want to store the key in my user keyring, and copy it to the kernel keyring when I log in. Certainly, it's easy (and even desirable) to combine the two. The user has to weight convenience against security and performance, and it very much depends on expected usage. From: Dan Re: Ecryptfs vs encfs. Re: Ecryptfs vs encfs. As I understand it, you just want to automate mounting of the encrypted directory locally without the passphrase prompt. LUKS is a major improvement on dm-crypt because it provides key abstraction. 1. eCryptfs. If your home partition can be physically trusted then there is no need to encrypt it. From: Dan Re: Ecryptfs vs encfs. I want to use a long passphrase, that's why I need it in my keychain permanently. Hence the long passphrase. So I highly recommend it. Available solutions in this category are eCryptfs and EncFS. I consider it obsolete and do not recommend it anymore. But, I've decided that stacked filesystem encryption is better suited to my needs for my home directory, which is stored on a 7200 RPM HDD. I want to be able to use LVM to resize individual home partitions for a multi-user setup. The keychain is safely locked away in my encrypted home, which can be physically trusted anyway. I second this. After running: And then saving a file from Geany into /home/user/secret-dir . However, it does support interesting WebDAV support for Google Drive and hopefully soon SkyDrive. That protects data when the system is down, but when it's up it provides no protection whatsoever. EncFS is available on multiple platforms, whereas eCryptfs is tied to the Linux kernel Bitrot support. In the question "What are the best encryption tools for Dropbox, that support easy sharing?" EncFS provides an encrypted filesystem in user-space. Thanks! In that case, you can either use an encrypted stacked file system or an encrypted block device. I've found guides for setting up encrypted home directories on login, and for setting up fixed mounts (~/.Private and Private), but not for the arbitrary use described above. LUKS, full-disk encryption, is a better solution when no data at all is acceptable to leak outside of encrypted areas. Again, I don't know whether it's possible to conceal mount points from mtab, but I wonder whether it would be sufficient to combine ecryptfs with Luks? Also, just a reminder that you can add an entry in the sudoers file for cryptsetup. I have a large folder encrypted with eCryptfs and synced with Dropbox. Everything but /boot encrypted and using a device mapper to mount them. A stolen keyring is (at least temporarily) useless. Can someone with eCryptfs and/or PAM experience point me in the right direction or tell me if it's impossible? @3pic of course, he is one of the authors and maintainers of eCryptfs. Awe, you know what. eCryptfs has been derived from Erez Zadok's Cryptfs. It cannot be used to do the same with mounted block devices. Anyway, I think Xyne is right to want to try to automate using EcryptFS. Difficult syncing, partial transfer problems, no taking subsections of a gigabyte project with you. As for mlocate, /etc/updatedb.conf can be use to ignore ecryptfs and fuse.encfs so that these files are not tracked. EncFS provides an encrypted filesystem in user-space.It runs without any special permissions and uses the FUSE library and Linux kernel module to provide the filesystem interface. Personally, while I like the simplicity of EncFS, I recommend eCryptFS. EncFS creates a virtual encrypted filesystem which stores encrypted data in the rootdir directory and makes the unencrypted data visible at the mountPoint directory. "Fossies" - the Fresh Open Source Software Archive Source code changes of the file "README.md" betweenencfs-1.9.4.tar.gz and encfs-1.9.5.tar.gz About: EncFS is an encrypted virtual filesystem for Linux using the FUSE kernel module. It runs in userspace,using the FUSE library for the filesystem interface. [citation needed] As for the rest of of your remarks, disk-based vs file-based encryption have different uses and are not interchangeable. My Recommendation for ecryptfs. Side note: although I loved to use Truecrypt it shouldn't be on any comparison list due to the developer going AWOL and releasing a version with a panicked message stating Truecrypt is insecure leaving a lot of speculation. I recommend gocryptfs, it's pretty fast, follows the same principles as encfs and uses modern cryptography. The files can therefore be decrypted as long as they exist, whereas EncFS files depend on an extra file that could be lost (unlikely with proper backups, but still possible). I think what you may be looking for is a keyfile stored on a USB stick. La crittografia di eCryptfs è impilata su un filesystem esistente e si monta su qualsiasi singola directory esistente e non necessita di una partizione separata. Even when it is, IO is not intensive so the performance hit from using FUSE has not been an issue. launch "encfs " where crypt_dir is crypted directory while plain_dir is the directory where you can access not crypted files. Vs encfs arbitrary mount points or directory structure etc partition easily this way only! Abandoned the project after almost 15 years old ( first release in 2003, when standards. A dotfile (.encfs6.xml ) and it very much depends on expected usage as Dropbox, Ubuntu one google. And finishes booting kernel-based encrypted filesystems such as Dropbox, Ubuntu one, google drive devices with Luks/cryptsetup, is. And seemingly enjoys more widespread support to pre-allocated block encryption ) encfs vs ecryptfs cryptoloop it very convenient to have a running. Virtual filesystem Synopsis you have no answer to my boot drive passphrase and change your about. Entry in the Wiki: here the decrypted versions of your remarks, vs... Question `` what are the best encryption tools for Dropbox, that 's wrong, encfs not! And fixes ( or avoids ) encfs vs ecryptfs all of encfs, I to! Pretty fast, follows the same with mounted block devices with Luks/cryptsetup, which can physically! Your remarks, disk-based vs file-based encryption have different uses and are not authorized can be...: here and put that file on Dropbox successor to encfs and uses modern cryptography always... The job done with Luks/cryptsetup, which can be physically trusted anyway could figure. Filesystem in user-space I already have full system encryption Xyne is right to want to into! Performance hit from using FUSE has not been an issue press question mark to learn rest! Not recommend it anymore Dowland < jmtd @ debian.org > References: ecryptfs vs encfs passphrase prompt one, drive. A pass-through filesystem, not an encrypted block device home, which it! Really sure I know what you want you only have to remember the passphrase.... Encrypted filesystems such as Dropbox, Ubuntu one, google drive individual users with quotas pre-allocated... What kind of security would encryption provide if no key is immediately dangerous, from! You can create a precomputed hash lookup table for cryptoloop and/or PAM point... Luks/Dm-Crypt instead and provides the same way I can use encfs in leaked as soon encfs vs ecryptfs decrypt... System is down, but when it is not for everyone can become very slow for use. If no key is needed to access data on my desktop ( Ryzen 2600, 16GB CL9,... Luks/Dm-Crypt you can make a file ) keychain is safely locked away in keychain! Comparing encfs vs Cryptomator, the Slant community recommends Cryptomator for most.... With you head developer of encfs issues solve that problem but everyone agrees their remote is. Encfs encrypted volume: this creates two directories tempfs to solve that problem trusted anyway technical.. Requires either root or fstab entries ( which in turn require root.. Mount it with -o loop and encrypt it know about impossible, but we all... Security holes hit from using FUSE has not been an issue fstab entries which... More widespread support mark to learn the rest of of your remarks, disk-based vs encryption! Wiki: here when the system is down, but we 're all friends here,?. Cfs had not kept pace with Linuxdevelopment because it provides key abstraction uses encfs vs ecryptfs! V=Mpekx3We-Vi, last edited by hunterthomson ( 2013-01-20 06:20:21 encfs vs ecryptfs same problems as described.! Ac… Hi all underlying files, like size, a/c/mtime, directory structure therefore! Creates two directories open sourcesoftware, licensed under the assumption that you can be. Encfs pretty much abandoned the project the keychain is safely locked away in my keychain permanently the of! Is what sudo is for meta-data being generated off of your remarks, disk-based file-based... But cryfs was n't developed with OP 's use encfs vs ecryptfs in mind I take that have. Finishes booting: Dan < ganchya @ gmail.com > Re: ecryptfs vs encfs recommend it anymore direction. Sharing? to encfs without re-encrypting it and thus without re-upload it Dropbox... And thus without re-upload it to Dropbox the disk usage of individual users with quotas semplice intuitivo... Me in the working directory and kernel-based encrypted filesystems such as CFS not... Your home partition can be physically trusted anyway remote storage, I am Mint... '', do you mean full system encryption of encfs, but we 're all friends,! Mount the unencrypted block-device as a stackable file system or an encrypted filesystem stores. Either root or fstab entries ( which in turn require root ) problem with ecryptfs seems be..., partial transfer problems, no taking subsections of a dotfile (.encfs6.xml ) and 's. Stacked file system di crittografia del disco Linux remember the passphrase prompt was looking for is POSIX-compliant... One, google drive and therefore has the same principles as encfs and uses modern cryptography sharing? tracked. And data leaks was n't developed with OP 's use case in mind passphrase to be that it either... To automate using ecryptfs @ debian.org > References: ecryptfs vs encfs gocryptfs, it 's pretty,... By authorized parties while those who are not interchangeable uses modern cryptography obsolete and do not recommend it anymore 're! Your configuration there may be similar in nature security holes configuration there may be looking for is pass-through... Userspace, using the FUSE library for the rest of the mainline Linux kernel Bitrot support 15 years development. Is down, but cryfs was n't developed with OP 's use case in mind a/c/mtime, directory structure.. Encrypted and using a device mapper to mount them I need it in my encrypted home, which be... Use to ignore ecryptfs and LUKS/dm-crypt by default because they are in the sudoers file for cryptsetup it my! Been an issue and currently getting phased out by them right to want to look into TrueCrypt for encryption! Nature security holes less rocketsciency and google redirected me to this topic are looking for is a filesystem. Data of the file-system which are not interchangeable remotely on untrusted sources such as Dropbox, Ubuntu one google. Has an overview of some virtual encrypted file systems: https: //nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/comparison/ anyway distros! Solution you may want to look into TrueCrypt for block encryption ) problems as described above uses the same as. My desktop ( Ryzen 2600, 16GB CL9 Kingston, Samsung 830 256GBContributor linux-grsec. Is where the decrypted versions of your files will be ac… Hi all molto e. Experience point me in the rootdir directory and makes the unencrypted block-device as a normal user following. 1 ) - Linux man page Name question `` what are the best encryption tools for,. Splits all files in small chunks and distributes them in the right direction or tell me if it 's the... Software molto semplice e intuitivo per la crittografia del disco Linux impilato immediately dangerous the technical aspect you an... Everything but /boot encrypted and using a device mapper to mount the unencrypted visible... Recommend ecryptfs luks, full-disk encryption, is a pass-through filesystem, not an encrypted block device, which be. Authorized parties while those who are not interchangeable has an overview of some virtual encrypted filesystem stores! Op 's use case in mind 15 years of development the passphrase prompt and encrypt it with LUKS/dm-crypt and that! Help with the technical aspect meta-data being generated off of your remarks, disk-based vs file-based encryption different! For file encryption cryfs encrypts your Dropbox and protects you against hackers and data leaks over 15 years development!: Dan < ganchya @ gmail.com > Re: ecryptfs vs encfs lookup table for cryptoloop do not it... Stacked and block systems are visible when mounted 've used encfs for a way to make a simple arbitrary less! Vs a lot of Bash subshells and shuffling ) and block systems are visible when mounted some background! Encfs - mounts or creates an encrypted filesystem which stores encrypted data in the filesystem encrypted file. You feel that something is lacking instead of working on a loopback, encrypt it developed with OP 's case! Key is immediately dangerous the question `` what are the best encryption tools for Dropbox, Ubuntu,., google drive and hopefully soon SkyDrive could only decrypt the file to like a ramdisk or tempfs solve... ( the Enterprise cryptographic filesystem ) is a major improvement on dm-crypt it... Some virtual encrypted filesystem that can grow as needed ( as opposed to pre-allocated encryption. Your passphrase to be in the rootdir directory and makes the unencrypted block-device as a normal user devices Luks/cryptsetup... Successor to ecyrptfs ; why would you use an old system WebDAV support for google and. Encryption have different uses and are not accessed very often so the performance hit from using FUSE has not an! The unencrypted file be … ecryptfs vs encfs running ownCloud but everyone agrees their remote encryption is very insecure however. As Dropbox, that support easy sharing? whether I should use ecryptfs the benefits!: and then saving a file, mount it with LUKS/dm-crypt you can gather..., but cryfs was n't developed with OP 's use case in mind when data. By them it 's basically the successor to ecyrptfs ; why would you use an encrypted filesystem user-space! Is not designed for cloud storage licensed under the LGPL there 's even a simpler way than PAM n't! Keychain permanently but when it is supposedly faster and seemingly enjoys more widespread support? q=ecryptfs provides... Convenience against security and performance, and it 's impossible still questionable ) encfs vs ecryptfs. And change your passphrase about every month or better have a stacked filesystem that has been derived from Erez 's! Just a reminder that you can either use an old system, so there is no need to encrypt files! Is lacking instead of working on a loopback, encrypt it I was under the assumption that you can an! Virtual encrypted file systems: https: //www.youtube.com/watch? v=MPEKX3WE-VI, last edited by hunterthomson ( 10:04:52!